History of the Foundation

View grantees in the Image Library

Symp 146 Participants
Front: Leslie Aiello, Magdalena Villarreal, Shenjing He, Frances Pine Middle: Janet Roitman, Jennifer Cole, Laurie Obbink, Karen Brodkin, Susana Narotzky, Isabelle Guérin, Steve Gudeman Back: Gavin Smith, Jaime Palomera, Niko Besnier, Benôit de l’Estoile, Vincent Dubois, Parker Shipton, Stef Jansen, Katherine Gibson, Deborah James

Wenner-Gren Symposium #146
September 14-20, 2012
Tivoli Palacio de Seteais
Sintra, Portugal

PUBLICATION: "Crisis, Value, and Hope:  Rethinking the Economy" (Current Anthropology Vol. 55, S9, August 2014)

PARTICIPANTS:

Leslie C. Aiello (Wenner-Gren Foundation, USA)
Niko Besnier, organizer (University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
Jennifer Cole (University of Chicago, USA)
Benoit de l’Estoile (CNRS-Paris, France)
Vincent Dubois (University of Strasbourg, France)
Katherine Gibson (University of Western Sydney, Australia)
Stephen F. Gudeman (University of Minnesota, USA)
Isabelle Guerin (University Paris, France)
Shenjing He (Sun Yat-Sen University, PRC)
Deborah A. James (London School of Economics, UK)
Stefaan Jansen (University of Manchester, UK)
Susana Narotzky, organizer (University of Barcelona, Spain)
Jaime Palomera, monitor (University of Barcelona, Spain)
Frances Theresa Pine (Goldsmiths, University of London, UK)
Janet L. Roitman (New School for Social Research, USA)
Parker Shipton (Boston University, USA)
Gavin A. Smith (University of Toronto, Canada)
Magdalena Villarreal Martinez (CIESAS Occidente, Mexico)

Organizers' Statement

This symposium sought to re-think the economy from the perspective of contemporary theory in economic and political anthropology, and explore how this re-thinking informs other concerns in cultural anthropology. Specifically, the organizers aimed to explore what counts as economic and how different processes that count as economic interact with one another. Furthermore, they wished to explore what happens when different regimes of value overlap in the same context and what role the economy plays in linking the past and the present to the future. These endeavors begin with an ethnographic investigation of what these questions mean for people on the ground, particularly people for whom crisis is not a state of exception but a normalized condition. Three important categories emerge in this investigation: crisis, value, and hope. We seek to understand how they interact.

The symposium brought together scholars from diverse backgrounds who are all committed to empirically grounded approaches to these questions with the aim of contextualizing but also transcending the “economy of (mainstream) economics.” This endeavor required a re-thinking about how we model the economy, which does not approach forms of concrete and abstract capital as mutually reinforcing but, on the contrary, as potentially disjointed and complementary. It also required sustained attention to parameters of inequality, such as gender, class, race, ethnicity, and age.

What leads us in this re-thinking is the convergence of three interlocking premises:

  1. We seek to contextualize this basic insight in two sets of dynamics: a) prosperity as a historical anomaly in that, even for the relatively privileged segments of the wealthiest societies, the post-WWII years were a moment of exceptional economic stability and predictability; and b) what is commonly portrayed as the current “temporary” crisis as exposing the precarity with which most people contend on a permanent basis.  Normalized crisis is characteristic of the lives of the poor, but of many others as well.  Crisis is also constitutive of downward mobility within both individual lives and across generations.  Crisis is the context for a re-evaluation of value and a re-consideration of the way in which past, present, and future are inter-related in people’s lives.
  2. The economy cuts across a broad range of human activities beyond the purely material and is constituted by different and co-existing regimes of value.  Those for whom economic crisis is norm operate with coping strategies that transcend the search for elusive material resources.  These strategies include relations of trust, networks of reciprocity encompassing both material and ideational resources, economies of affect, “informal” economies, care-giving chains, and so on.  People invest in multiple aspects of existence which also have economic characteristics and consequences.  Among the poor, social relations constitute a much safer “investment” than faith in direct material returns, contrary to, for example, the assumptions that underlie development policies that prioritize micro-entrepreneurship.  Here we challenge the fetishization of the market and more generally of economic activities, a fetishization that, with the turn to neoliberalism in late modernity, has incr