Workshop on Heritage and Politics
May 9-12, 2003
Tinakilly Country House, Rathnew, Co. Wicklow, Ireland
Paul Basu (University College London, UK)
Barbara Bender (University College London, USA)
Jennifer Curtis (Washington University, USA)
Les Field (U. New Mexico, USA)
Richard Fox (Wenner-Gren Foundation, USA)
Susan Gal (U. Chicago, USA)
Craig Howe (Oglala Lakota College, USA)
Daniel Linger (U. California-Santa Cruz, USA)
Louise Meintjes (Duke University, USA)
Jon P. Mitchell (U. Sussex, UK)
Howard Morphy (Australian National University, Australia)
Dorothy Robinson (Yale University, USA)
Paul Tapsell (Auckland War Memorial Museum, New Zealand)
Charlotte Townsend-Gault (U. British Columbia, Canada)
The objective of the workshop is to evaluate anthropology's capacity through basic research to make important interventions in public issues - focusing on heritage in this case. There is much concern nowadays over a "public anthropology," but no one is quite sure what this means.
Some take it to require advocacy from the anthropologist - that is, active political engagement. Others see it as necessitating an applied anthropology that tries to develop public policy. My understanding of a "public anthropology" is different, in keeping with the Wenner-Gren Foundation's mission to support basic research. I prefer to speak of "anthropology in public," and I mean by that the way in which basic research in anthropology gives us significant knowledge about conditions and situations in the public sphere. Like most anthropologists, I believe we have many (partial, perhaps transient, certainly lower-case) truths to impart on public issues from our ongoing research, and I have faith that we can discern important future directions for our research efforts. To take the measure of anthropology's research accomplishments on the issue of heritage and to discern where next we should put our efforts these, then, are the objectives of the workshop.
Participants will no doubt address these broad issues through papers using the case materials they have generated in their specific research programs. Our discussions will work up from these most particular case materials to the most general perspectives, in keeping with anthropology's skill (according to Clifford Geertz) at asking very large questions from very localized knowledge.