History of the Foundation

View grantees in the Image Library

WGF International Symp #126 Group Photo
Front: M. Orgel, C. Goodwin, R. Berman, A. Swedlund, E. Ochs, A. Gingrich, M. Pavelka, L. Obbink. Back: C. Ramble, S. Silverman, C. Brettell, M. Mahoney, R. Meindl, S. Lindenbaum, B. Bender, J. Rashford, M. Leone, B. Schieffelin, R. Fox, R. Paynter.

WENNER-GREN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM #126
March 24 – April 1, 2000
Hotel Bon Sol, Illetas (Palma), Mallorca

PUBLICATION: Special Issue of Current Anthropology:  “Repertoires of Timekeeping in Anthropology,” Vol. 43, August-October 2002.

PARTICIPANTS:

CA Special Issue CoverBarbara Bender (University College, London, UK)
Ruth Berman (Tel Aviv University, Israel)
Caroline Brettell (Southern Methodist University, USA)
Richard Fox (Wenner-Gren Foundation, USA)
Andre Gingrich, organizer (University of Vienna, Austria)
Charles Goodwin (University of California, Los Angeles, USA)
Mark Leone (University of Maryland, USA)
Shirley Lindenbaum (City University of New York, Graduate Center, USA)
Mary Pavelka (University of Calgary, Canada)
Richard Meindl (Kent State University, USA)
Elinor Ochs, organizer (University of California - Los Angeles, USA)
Mary Orgel (University of Massachusetts, USA)
Robert Paynter (University of Massachusetts, USA)
Charles Ramble (Université de Paris X, France)
John Rashford (College of Charleston, South Carolina)
Bambi Schieffelin (New York University, USA)
Sydel Silverman (Wenner-Gren Foundation, USA)
Alan Swedlund (University of Massachusetts, USA)

Final Report

A conference on “Time and Temporalities in the Anthropological Record” took place in Mallorca, Spain, from March 24 to April 1, 2000, as reckoned by the Gregorian calendar and through American recording conventions.

The conference probed the concept of ´record´ through an examination of culturally and professionally diverse modalities for temporally situating events. Modalities for recording include, but are not limited to, oral, visual, written, musical, material, and somatic forms.  Moreover, they extend beyond institutional documents to informal, local, and individual repositories of time. As such, conference participants were encouraged to explore the concept of ´record´ beyond the conventional definitions, such as “an account made in an enduring form, especially in writing, that preserves the knowledge or memory of events or facts” (American Heritage dictionary of the English Language).  Although any form of record allegedly is only a construction of the past, participants considered how it simultaneously informs present and future realities. Central to the interest of this conference was the notion that forms of recording are situated and vary, within and across societies in time and space.  Records therefore are both informed by and inform their socio-historical contexts.

For the purpose of the conference, the concept of time was juxtaposed with that of temporality in such a way that time can be used in the sense of modern physics, as a processual quality of the material world, whereas temporality designates how beings experience such processual qualities, e.g. through memory or anticipation. These introductory suggestions encouraged participants to move beyond the simplistic dichotomies of subjectivism and objectivism, without attempting to create a unified epistemological stance among conference participants. 

Rather than being a “state of the art” summation of a well researched anthropological topic, a central goal of the conference was to bring into dialogue for the first time perspectives on recording evolutionary, historical, life span, and interactive time and temporality across the fields tha